| ||||||||
Summary Case Summary The complainant claims that he is a co-promoter of the project and has sold the land to the respondent but did not get full consideration until now. The complainant also claims that certain facts regarding encumbrances have been suppressed while registering the project. The respondent in his appearing showed that the name of respondent is mentioned in the Property Register Card, which has considerate value. Conclusion by MahaRERA As the name of the respondent is mentioned in the Property Register Card, and the complainant is neither the affected party of the project nor the allottee of the project, there can be no merits for him. Hence, the complaint is disposed. |
Copyright © 2025 RERA Filing. All rights reserved.